1 – (Brief announcement about the fact of the name of the Awaited Imam Mahdi)
08 – 08 – 1431 AH
20 – 07 – 2010 AD
The first reply of the Imam to the member Ibn A’la:
The Awaited Mahdi orders Al-Husain son of Omar to have good traits with patience and not the ban to the inquirer of dialogue..
In the name of Allah the All Merciful, the Most Merciful, and peace be upon the messengers, and praise be to Allah Lord of the worlds..
Allah’s peace be upon the you my beloved supporters and all newcomers to inquire the dialogue searching for the Truth and the Truth is more worthy to be followed, and Allah’s peace, mercy and His blessings be upon my brother the honorable Al-Husain son of Omar..
I am the Awaited Imam Mahdi commanding Al-Husain son of Omar and all the supporters by having the good traits of patience and I order staff of the management altogether by not banning who begins the dialogue with the Imam Nasser Mohammad Al-Yemeni until a decision is issued from the Awaited Mahdi in banning him after we uphold the argument against him with Truth and we dominate over him with the bridling authority of knowledge, so if he continued after that in wasting the time of the Awaited Mahdi then he argues with him about his affair surely there is no blame against us to order banning him after all the supporters and the visitors found that the Imam Nasser Mohammad Al-Yemeni is truly the dominant one in the dialogue with knowledge and authority as we will do now with Allah’s permission to who desire to follow the Truth and the Truth is more worthy to be followed.
O Ibn A’la, welcome and hello to you at the global dialogue table for the Awaited Mahdi and to all the Muslims and the disbelievers. I see you arguing with us about the word the coinciding which the Imam Mahdi gave fatwa that the intended with the word coinciding in language and legitimacy is the concurring and not the exact matching, so we found Ibn A’la is still arguing with the supporters a big argument and gives fatwa with false that the intended from the word coinciding in the Book is the exact matching, but the Awaited Imam issues fatwa with Truth that the intended with word of coinciding that it is the concurring and not the exact matching. In order for Ibn A’la to know the intended; then the Awaited Imam Mahdi Nasser Mohammad cast this news in what follows:
(Bush Jr. and his host Blair have coincided on invading Iraq)
Do you have any objection on this fatwa my honorable brother Ibn A’la? So if your reply with yes that Bush Jr. and his host Blair have coincided on invading Iraq unjustly, then the Imam Mahdi Nasser Mohammad Al-Yemeni says to you: Don’t you see that the coinciding is the concurring; in the meaning of that Bush Jr. and his host Blair have agreed on invading Iraq? In that case the True explanatory-statement for the word coinciding is the concurring and not the matching, so is it correct to say: (Bush Jr. and his host Blair have matched on invading Iraq)
Then how do you issue fatwa that the coinciding is the matching? In fact my honorable brother; the coinciding is the concurring linguistically, so why do you argue without knowledge neither guidance nor enlightening Book? I ask Allah to guide you and too forgive you, do you still have objection to the fatwa of Imam Mahdi about the explanatory-statement of coinciding word that it is truly the concurring and not matching? And if you refused — O Ibn A’la — but to be the intended for the coinciding word is the matching then the Imam Mahdi repeats the question to you once again, is it correct that we say:
(Matched Bush Jr. and his host Blair on invading Iraq)?
Or we say:
Coincided Bush Jr. and his host Blair on invading Iraq)?
Thus we say:
Concurred Bush Jr. and his host Blair on invading Iraq)?
Therefore, the coinciding is not the matching; in fact the coinciding is the concurring so why they argue in the Truth after it cleared to you that it is the Truth from your Lord?
And peace be upon the messengers, and praise be to Allah Lord of the worlds
Your brother; the Imam Mahdi Nasser Mohammad Al-Yemeni